AI Summary of Scholarly Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Assam courts encode majoritarian suspicion and silence

Research area:law-regulationlegal-systems

What the study found

The article finds that courts in Assam, India, can help produce majoritarian domination through routine judicial practices. It argues that judges do this in two ways: by actively creating suspicion about minority identities and by withdrawing judicial attention so that minorities become legally invisible.

Why the authors say this matters

The authors conclude that this helps explain how courts can routinise hierarchy and make authoritarianism durable and legally sanctioned. The study suggests this is especially relevant in Assam, where denationalisation policies threaten many people, particularly Bengali-origin Muslims.

What the researchers tested

The researchers examined more than 1,200 rulings from the Assam High Court since 2009. They used the idea of "legal work," meaning the judicial labour judges perform or withhold, to study how courts encode majoritarian domination.

What worked and what didn't

According to the article, exercised judicial labour appeared in doctrines about evidence, reliability, and juridical truth that treated minority identities as presumptively fraudulent and foreign. Withdrawn judicial labour appeared when courts refused to record, engage with, or reason through minority claims, which the authors describe as rendering minorities legally invisible.

What to keep in mind

The summary provided does not describe specific case examples, statistical measures, or countervailing findings. The article’s claims are based on Assam High Court rulings and are presented through a theoretical and empirical framework focused on that setting.

Key points

  • The article argues that majoritarian domination is produced through everyday judicial practices.
  • It analyzes more than 1,200 Assam High Court rulings from 2009 onward.
  • Judicial labour is described as either exercised, creating suspicion, or withdrawn, creating silence.
  • Minority identities are said to be constructed as presumptively fraudulent and foreign in some rulings.
  • Court silence is described as leaving minorities legally invisible.

Disclosure

Research title:
Assam courts encode majoritarian suspicion and silence
Authors:
M. Mohsin Alam Bhat, Arushi Gupta
Institutions:
Columbia University, Queen Mary University of London
Publication date:
2026-03-23
OpenAlex record:
View
AI provenance: This post was generated by gpt-5.4-mini (OpenAI). The original authors did not write or review this post.