What the study found
The study found that Indonesian scientific journals have been institutionalized as instruments of public governance rather than serving only as places for academic communication. The governance system is described as relying on standardized accreditation, performance-based evaluation, integrated quality assurance, and administratively enforced publication ethics.
Why the authors say this matters
The authors conclude that government policies have strengthened accountability, transparency, and systemic integration in Indonesian scientific publishing. They also suggest that the growing use of standards-based governance and digital oversight creates a challenge in balancing administrative compliance with the substantive epistemic quality of scientific publications.
What the researchers tested
The researchers used thematic analysis of policy documents. These documents included laws, regulations, administrative policies, ethical codes, and operational guidelines governing scientific journals, and they were coded to identify regulatory objectives, governance mechanisms, quality assurance instruments, publication ethics arrangements, and policy implementation through digital systems.
What worked and what didn't
According to the abstract, government policies appear to have enabled stronger accountability, transparency, and integration in journal governance. Digital systems also played a central role in making standards into routine, data-driven practices that support monitoring, verification, and auditability. The abstract also notes a tension: the same system may make it harder to preserve substantive scientific quality alongside administrative compliance.
What to keep in mind
This summary is based only on policy documents, not on direct measurement of journal quality or user experience. The abstract does not describe specific limitations beyond noting the challenge of balancing compliance with epistemic quality.
Key points
- Indonesian scientific journals are described as part of public governance, not only academic communication.
- Journal governance includes standardized accreditation, performance-based evaluation, and integrated quality assurance.
- Publication ethics are presented as administratively enforced.
- Digital systems help turn regulatory standards into routine monitoring, verification, and auditability.
- The authors note a possible tension between administrative compliance and substantive scientific quality.
Disclosure
- Research title:
- Indonesian journal governance relies on standards and digital oversight
- Authors:
- Irwansyah
- Publication date:
- 2026-02-02
- DOI:
- 10.6087/kcse.394
- OpenAlex record:
- View
Get the weekly research newsletter
Stay current with scholarly research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.