What the study found
The article concludes that recent evidence raises doubts about whether noncompete clauses mainly serve as efficient contracting tools. It notes that these clauses are often used beyond jobs with sensitive information and are associated with lower mobility, wages, innovation, and entrepreneurship.
Why the authors say this matters
The authors suggest this matters because noncompete clauses may affect workers and firms more broadly than intended, including through spillovers to other workers and across state lines. The findings indicate that current state-level enforcement may not fully address these effects.
What the researchers tested
The article reassesses the long-running debate over noncompete clauses using recent policy attention plus new empirical and theoretical research. It compares arguments that noncompetes protect training and trade secret investments with evidence on their observed labor-market and innovation effects.
What worked and what didn't
The article reports that proponents argue noncompete clauses can help protect training and trade secret investments and may increase productivity and wages. However, recent studies indicate that widespread enforceable noncompetes are linked to lower mobility, wages, innovation, and entrepreneurship, and that less restrictive contract terms often appear to protect firm interests instead.
What to keep in mind
The abstract does not describe a single study design or report new original estimates; it is a reassessment based on prior empirical and theoretical research. It also does not provide detailed limitations beyond noting spillovers, cross-state effects, and behavioral effects when noncompetes are unenforceable.
Key points
- The article reassesses the debate over noncompete clauses using recent research.
- Noncompete clauses are described as often extending beyond roles with sensitive information.
- Recent studies link enforceable noncompetes to lower mobility, wages, innovation, and entrepreneurship.
- The article says less restrictive contract terms may often protect firm interests.
- The abstract raises concerns that state-level enforcement may not fully capture spillovers and behavioral effects.
Disclosure
- Research title:
- Noncompete clauses are linked to lower mobility and wages
- Authors:
- Evan Starr
- Institutions:
- University of Maryland, College Park
- Publication date:
- 2026-02-01
- DOI:
- 10.1257/jep.20251457
- OpenAlex record:
- View
Get the weekly research newsletter
Stay current with scholarly research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.