What the study found
The study found a statistically significant negative relationship between earlier environmental, social and governance (ESG) incident intensity and later incident prevalence across EU countries. In plain terms, more severe past ESG shocks were followed by a lower share of firms with incidents later on.
Why the authors say this matters
The authors suggest that scandals may act as institutional signals, meaning they can help shift what businesses in a country see as acceptable behavior beyond the firms directly involved. They also say the findings have policy implications by highlighting transparent monitoring, consistent reporting standards, and stakeholder oversight as supports for sustainable corporate conduct.
What the researchers tested
The researchers used RepRisk data from 2015–2020 on ESG incidents reported for firms in EU countries. They aggregated the data to the country-year level and measured misconduct in two ways: prevalence, or the share of firms with at least one ESG incident, and intensity, or the average RepRisk reputational risk indicator among firms involved in incidents. They then tested whether past intensity was associated with later prevalence using panel regression models with macroeconomic controls.
What worked and what didn't
The lagged intensity measure showed a statistically significant negative relationship with current prevalence. This means that higher past incident intensity was associated with a lower current share of firms involved in ESG incidents at the country level. The abstract does not report any null or contradictory results.
What to keep in mind
The summary does not describe detailed limitations beyond the study's country-level design and the 2015–2020 period covered by RepRisk data. Because the analysis is based on aggregated country-year data, the abstract does not support firm-level conclusions.
Key points
- The study examined whether historical corporate irresponsibility is linked to later ESG compliance in EU countries.
- ESG incidents were measured in two ways: prevalence and intensity.
- Past incident intensity was negatively associated with later incident prevalence.
- The authors interpret scandals as possible institutional signals that can shift business norms.
- The abstract says the findings have policy implications for monitoring, reporting standards, and stakeholder oversight.
Disclosure
- Research title:
- Past ESG scandals are linked to lower later incident prevalence in EU countries
- Authors:
- Gabriela Chmelíková, Helena Chládková, Renata Kučerová, Jindřich Špička
- Institutions:
- Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Mendel University in Brno, Mendel University in Brno, Mendel University in Brno
- Publication date:
- 2026-03-07
- OpenAlex record:
- View
Get the weekly research newsletter
Stay current with scholarly research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.