AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: MODERATE — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

Narrative, not site history, shaped discomfort in the experiment

A red brick colonial-style university building with white columns and a peaked roof, surrounded by manicured lawns and mature trees on a clear day.
Research area:Social SciencesSocial PsychologyNarrative

What the study found

The study found no effect of site history on the five preregistered outcomes. A narrative, whether truthful or fabricated, modestly reduced comfort, while anxiety, attachment, moral gravity, and paranormal sensations did not change.

Why the authors say this matters

The authors conclude that any environment-based "haunting" appears negligible and that unease is located in suggestion rather than setting. They also say ghost criminology would need clear observations and thresholds that could count against it if they fail.

What the researchers tested

The researcher ran a preregistered 2 × 2 field experiment with 319 participants at two architecturally matched university buildings. One building had a documented Civil War-era history involving enslaved labor, mass amputations, and temporary corpse storage; the other had no violent history. Participants visited one of the sites and read either a truthful, a falsely assigned, or a neutral description before rating comfort, state anxiety, place attachment, moral gravity, and paranormal sensations.

What worked and what didn't

Across the five preregistered outcomes, site history did not affect responses. Narratives lowered comfort modestly whether they described the real history or falsely assigned it to the other building, but there were no changes in anxiety, attachment, moral gravity, or anomalous sensations.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not describe additional limitations beyond the authors' point that ghost criminology lacks specified failure conditions. The findings are limited to the tested buildings, participants, narratives, and the measured outcomes.

Key points

  • The experiment found no measurable effect of building history on five preregistered outcomes.
  • Comfort decreased modestly after reading a narrative, whether the history was true or fabricated.
  • State anxiety, place attachment, moral gravity, and paranormal sensations did not change.
  • The authors say any environment-based haunting was negligible and suggestion mattered more than setting.
  • The abstract says ghost criminology would need clear observations and failure thresholds to remain explanatory.

Disclosure

Research title:
Narrative, not site history, shaped discomfort in the experiment
Authors:
Ian T. Adams
Institutions:
University of South Carolina
Publication date:
2026-03-02
OpenAlex record:
View
AI provenance: This post was generated by OpenAI. The original authors did not write or review this post.