AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: STRONG — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

Students showed cohesive devices but need stronger grammatical cohesion

A person sitting at a wooden table surrounded by scattered newspaper clippings, printed documents, and papers, appearing to review and organize research materials for academic work.
Research area:LinguisticsLinguistics and Language AnalysisDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

What the study found: The study found that fifth-semester Darussunnah students used cohesive devices in their argumentative writing, but their use needs improvement, especially in grammatical cohesion.
Why the authors say this matters: The authors conclude that improving cohesive device use, particularly grammatical cohesion, is needed to achieve a higher level of cohesion in writing.
What the researchers tested: The researchers analyzed one piece of argumentative writing by fifth-semester Darussunnah students using discourse analysis. They examined both grammatical cohesion and lexical cohesion with a mixed-method approach that combined qualitative and quantitative analysis.
What worked and what didn't: The result showed that students had performed cohesive devices. However, the abstract states that their use was not strong enough and that grammatical cohesion needed further improvement.
What to keep in mind: The available summary does not describe the number of texts analyzed beyond the stated piece of writing, and it does not provide detailed examples or specific counts of cohesive devices.

Key points

  • The study examined cohesive devices in argumentative writing by fifth-semester Darussunnah students.
  • Students did use cohesive devices in their writing.
  • Grammatical cohesion was identified as an area needing improvement.
  • The researchers used both qualitative and quantitative analysis within a discourse analysis framework.
  • The abstract does not provide detailed examples or counts of the cohesive devices found.

Disclosure

Research title:
Students showed cohesive devices but need stronger grammatical cohesion
Authors:
Haqim Hasan Albana, Abdul Gafur Marzuki, Alek Alek, Didin Nuruddin Hidayat
Institutions:
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta, IAIN Palangka Raya
Publication date:
2026-04-11
OpenAlex record:
View
AI provenance: This post was generated by OpenAI. The original authors did not write or review this post.