What the study found
The study found that, without information about economic contributions, respondents showed similar support for deporting gay and straight unauthorized immigrants. It also found that economic contributions substantially reduced support for deportation for both groups, but that partisan identity changed how respondents applied these judgments.
Why the authors say this matters
The authors conclude that partisan identity structures how people apply deservingness heuristics, meaning the rules or cues people use to judge who is seen as deserving, in immigration attitudes. They say these findings have implications for immigration policy debates around vulnerable immigrant populations.
What the researchers tested
The researchers used an original survey experiment with U.S. respondents whose sample mirrored Census quotas for key socio-demographic indicators. They examined unauthorized LGBTQ+ immigrants in the United States and studied how immigrants’ identity, economic contributions, and respondents’ partisanship shaped deportation attitudes.
What worked and what didn't
Without any information about economic contributions, support for deportation was similar for gay and straight unauthorized immigrants. When economic contributions were provided, support for deportation dropped substantially for both groups. The partisan pattern differed: Democrats rewarded gay unauthorized immigrants significantly more than straight unauthorized immigrants for their economic contributions, while Republicans showed substantially lower support for deportation of straight unauthorized immigrants who had made economic contributions.
What to keep in mind
The abstract does not describe detailed limitations beyond the study’s focus on unauthorized LGBTQ+ immigrants in the United States. The findings come from a survey experiment, so the summary is limited to the results and scope described in the abstract.
Key points
- Support for deporting gay and straight unauthorized immigrants was similar when no economic information was given.
- Information about economic contributions substantially lowered support for deportation for both groups.
- Democrats responded more positively to gay unauthorized immigrants’ economic contributions than to straight immigrants’ contributions.
- Republicans showed substantially lower support for deporting straight unauthorized immigrants who had made economic contributions.
- The authors say partisanship shapes how deservingness judgments are applied in immigration attitudes.
Disclosure
- Research title:
- Partisanship shapes support for deporting unauthorized immigrants
- Authors:
- Gabriele Magni, Zoila Ponce de León
- Institutions:
- Loyola Marymount University, University of Pittsburgh
- Publication date:
- 2026-03-12
- OpenAlex record:
- View
Get the weekly research newsletter
Stay current with peer-reviewed research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.