AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: STANDARD — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

Book review examines institutions and epidemic control across centuries

Two open pages of aged books or manuscripts with visible text, photographed under warm lighting that emphasizes the historical nature and texture of the yellowed pages.
Image Credit: Photo by DEHNCKA on Pixabay (SourceLicense)

AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. See full disclosure ↓

Journal of Economic Literature·2026-02-26·Peer-reviewed·View original paper ↗·Follow this topic (RSS)
Publication Signals show what we were able to verify about where this research was published.MODERATECore publication signals for this source were verified. Publication Signals reflect the source’s verifiable credentials, not the quality of the research.
  • ✔ Peer-reviewed source
  • ✔ No retraction or integrity flags
Research area:Arts and HumanitiesHistory and Philosophy of ScienceHistory of Science and Medicine

What the study found

The review describes Sheilagh Ogilvie’s book as exploring how human societies dealt with epidemic disease across the past seven centuries. It says the book highlights institutional features that helped coordinate responses to epidemics and support societal learning.

Why the authors say this matters

The abstract says the book investigates which institutional frameworks were better at coordinating responses to epidemics and devising innovations to improve societal learning. The study suggests this historical perspective is meant to identify features associated with more effective responses to epidemic disease.

What the researchers tested

This is a review by Vellore Arthi of the book "Controlling Contagion: Epidemics and Institutions from the Black Death to Covid." The Econlit abstract states that the book covers seven centuries of history to examine how societies responded to epidemic disease.

What worked and what didn't

The available abstract does not report specific empirical results. It only states that the book highlights institutional frameworks that were better at coordinating responses and better at devising innovations to improve societal learning.

What to keep in mind

The provided text is a review abstract, not the book itself, so it gives only a brief description of the book’s scope and themes. No detailed findings, methods, or limitations are described in the available summary.

Key points

  • The book examines how societies responded to epidemic disease over seven centuries.
  • It highlights institutional frameworks that helped coordinate epidemic responses.
  • It also highlights institutions that supported innovations for societal learning.
  • The provided abstract does not give detailed results or limitations.

Disclosure

Research title:
Book review examines institutions and epidemic control across centuries
Authors:
Vellore Arthi
Institutions:
University of California, Irvine
Publication date:
2026-02-26
OpenAlex record:
View
AI provenance: This post was generated by OpenAI. The original authors did not write or review this post.

Get the weekly research newsletter

Stay current with peer-reviewed research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.