What the study found
The study identifies "adaptive dynastic politics" as a distinct pattern in Indonesia during the Jokowi era, meaning political family rule that uses context-specific legitimacy building, mixed institutional tactics, digital coordination, and coalition management. The authors say this pattern was associated with democratic deterioration rather than open institutional collapse.
Why the authors say this matters
The authors conclude that this pattern shows how political dynasties can manipulate democratic institutions while keeping electoral legitimacy. They also suggest it offers insight into institutional manipulation in other developing democracies.
What the researchers tested
The researchers examined Indonesia from 2014 to 2024 using content analysis of 847 media articles and elite interviews. They also used process tracing, which is a way of linking events step by step to a causal pathway, to connect dynastic mechanisms with changes in democratic institutions.
What worked and what didn't
The abstract says constitutional engineering allowed family succession despite age requirements, and coordinated pressure produced 81% parliamentary control. It also reports that digital operations used 90-billion-rupiah government resources, while resistance from civil society, independent media, and judicial factions was real but mostly unsuccessful.
What to keep in mind
The available summary does not provide detailed limits beyond the scope of the Indonesia case and the Jokowi-era focus. The abstract presents the findings as evidence of causal links, but only the information given here can be summarized.
- The study describes "adaptive dynastic politics" as a distinct form of political family rule in Indonesia.
- Democratic indicators in Indonesia declined from 57/100 to 56/100 on Freedom House during the period discussed.
- The abstract says constitutional engineering enabled family succession despite age requirements.
- The authors report 81% parliamentary control and 90-billion-rupiah government resources for digital operations.
- Resistance from civil society, independent media, and judicial factions is described as significant but mostly unsuccessful.
