focalinterest.net

Tag: Mental Health Services & Access

  • Intersectional and area-level factors were linked to depression disparities

    What the study found

    The study found that depression in this All of Us research program sample was associated with both overlapping personal identities and area-level social conditions. The authors report several protective and risk-related patterns, including differences by sex at birth, age, military service, housing concerns, and neighborhood deprivation.

    Why the authors say this matters

    The authors conclude that clinical and public health strategies for depression prevention and intervention should account for overlapping identities and place-aware approaches. They suggest that using intersectionality, a framework that looks at how identities overlap, along with area-level indicators may give a more nuanced picture of depression disparities.

    What the researchers tested

    This was a cross-sectional study using electronic health records and survey data from the All of Us research network. The cohort included 33,994 people who completed social determinants of health surveys and had at least one inpatient visit, and the analysis used mixed-effects logistic regression with 3-digit ZIP code as a random effect after LASSO-based variable selection.

    What worked and what didn't

    Protective associations were reported for male sex at birth among straight and non-binary individuals, older adults with active military service or health insurance, and younger adults with 1–2 children. Higher depression risk was reported for inability to work, housing concerns, frequent disrespect, high area deprivation in older adults, and several intersectional combinations such as non-binary identity in older adults, non-binary individuals born outside the U.S., women with children, and Hispanic active-duty members.

    What to keep in mind

    The authors note that aggregation at the 3-digit ZIP code level may have obscured some area-level effects. The abstract does not describe other limitations in detail.

    • The study analyzed 33,994 All of Us participants who completed social determinants of health surveys.
    • Depression was reported in 31.7% of the sample between 2020 and 2025.
    • Risk was strongest for inability to work, with a reported OR of 2.01.
    • Non-binary identity in older adults and non-binary individuals born outside the U.S. showed particularly high reported odds ratios.
    • The authors say depression prevention and intervention should consider overlapping identities and place-aware approaches.

  • Awareness of mental health outpaced appropriate help-seeking

    What the study found

    The study found a gap between general awareness of mental health and appropriate help-seeking. Participants often recognized the term "mental health" but connected it mainly with mental illness and abnormal behavior, while professional help was usually seen as a last option for severe problems.

    Why the authors say this matters

    The authors conclude that improving mental health literacy (understanding of mental health and care options) needs to go beyond basic awareness. They say this should include better understanding of professional roles, normalization of psychological help for non-clinical concerns, and more community-level dialogue.

    What the researchers tested

    The researchers studied an urban non-clinical community sample of 100 adults in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. They used semi-structured interviews, an adapted version of the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire, qualitative manifest content analysis, and descriptive frequencies to examine mental health literacy and help-seeking preferences.

    What worked and what didn't

    Participants most commonly associated mental health with anxiety and depression, and many reported digital media as their main source of information. Help-seeking attitudes toward professional support were positive, but professional help was generally reserved for severe issues such as schizophrenia and suicidal thoughts, while non-clinical concerns were usually handled through trusted people or faith- and motivation-based sources.

    What to keep in mind

    This was a pilot study with a community sample of 100 adults from one urban area, so the findings are limited to that setting. The abstract does not describe additional limitations beyond the study's small, region-specific scope.

    • Participants knew the term mental health but often associated it with mental illness and abnormal behavior.
    • Anxiety and depression were the most common mental health issues mentioned.
    • Digital media was the main source of mental health information.
    • Professional help was viewed positively but mainly as a last option for severe problems.
    • Non-clinical concerns were usually managed through informal support, faith, or motivation-based sources.
  • Collaborative scale-up supported primary mental health screening in KwaZulu-Natal

    Collaborative scale-up supported primary mental health screening in KwaZulu-Natal

    What the study found

    The study found that a co-developed, collaborative approach with continuous quality improvement supported the scale-up of a common mental health screening tool in district primary health care systems in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The authors also found that this approach was broadly favored by participants.

    Why the authors say this matters

    The authors conclude that scaling up an integrated primary mental health screening innovation requires capacity building among mid-level management. The study suggests that a collaborative programme built on continuous quality improvement may offer flexibility and communal problem-solving for more sustained implementation.

    What the researchers tested

    The researchers used a participatory action research approach and established a learning collaborative involving district mental health service coordinators, provincial managers and policymakers, and the local research team. They co-developed a capacity building programme through participatory workshops, implemented the screening tool and its processes iteratively, and assessed the process using workshop proceedings, individual interviews, and a focus group discussion.

    What worked and what didn't

    The participatory development and implementation process led to consensus building, curriculum development, situational analyses, training, and continuous quality improvement. The collaborative and co-development approach to the curriculum was broadly favored, but barriers included a lack of formal guidance documents, limited intersectoral collaboration, limited community mental health literacy, under-prioritization of mental health, lack of ring-fenced funding and data monitoring systems, and limited training opportunities for primary health care staff.

    What to keep in mind

    The abstract does not describe a comparison group or quantify effects on patient outcomes. The findings are based on workshop proceedings, interviews, and one focus group in KwaZulu-Natal, and the summary notes that the COVID-19 period required adaptations, including virtual workshops and added programme changes.

    • A co-developed, collaborative approach was used to scale up a common mental health screening tool in KwaZulu-Natal.
    • Participants broadly favored the collaborative capacity-building programme.
    • The process included consensus building, training, situational analyses, and continuous quality improvement.
    • Barriers included weak guidance, limited collaboration, low mental health literacy, and insufficient funding and data systems.
    • The programme adapted during COVID-19, including a shift to virtual workshops.

  • Review maps social inclusion needs for people with severe mental illness

    What the study found

    The review finds that people with severe mental illness, including psychoses, bipolar disorder, and severe depression, experience high levels of social exclusion. It also identifies social inclusion as something that varies across culture, life stage, and gender, rather than meaning the same thing everywhere.

    Why the authors say this matters

    The authors suggest that mental health services alone may not be enough to address social inclusion, and that action is also needed through legislation, policy, statutory services, and civil society. They also conclude that better contextual adaptation is needed in future interventions.

    What the researchers tested

    This paper is a review of current practices, evidence, unmet needs, and future directions related to social inclusion in severe mental illness. The authors discuss subjective impacts such as loneliness, strategies to increase observable social inclusion, frameworks used in health services, and approaches to reduce stigma and discrimination.

    What worked and what didn't

    The paper reports that there is evidence for some interventions, but much of it comes from the Global North, with fewer examples from the Global South. It also notes alternative frameworks for social inclusion that may offer a more empowering approach for some people, but the abstract does not say which specific interventions are most effective.

    What to keep in mind

    The abstract does not provide a detailed list of outcomes, effect sizes, or study quality. It also does not specify which recommendations are strongest, only that the authors make recommendations for policy makers, researchers, health professionals, and advocates based on the evidence they found.

    • People with severe mental illness experience some of the highest rates of social exclusion.
    • Social inclusion is described as varying by culture, life stage, and gender.
    • The review considers interventions, legislation, services, and community-level strategies.
    • The authors note that evidence for some interventions is largely from the Global North.
    • The abstract highlights loneliness, stigma, and discrimination as important issues.

  • Video improved mental health literacy but not help-seeking intentions

    What the study found

    The video increased mental health literacy, meaning knowledge and understanding about mental health, in the full sample of Latinx adults. It did not increase help-seeking intentions, and it unexpectedly increased perceived stigma among Latinx females.

    Why the authors say this matters

    The authors conclude that these findings can guide future psychoeducational videos tailored for a Latinx audience. The study suggests such work may help improve access to and utilization of mental health services.

    What the researchers tested

    The researchers tested a culturally informed psychoeducational video in a non-college-educated Latinx adult sample. They examined whether the video affected mental health literacy and stigma, whether those effects differed by gender, and whether changes in literacy and stigma were linked to help-seeking intentions. They also analyzed responses to two open-ended questions for additional context.

    What worked and what didn't

    The video successfully increased mental health literacy across the full sample. It unexpectedly increased perceived stigma among Latinx females, and changes in mental health literacy and stigma did not lead to increased help-seeking intentions. The qualitative analysis offered context for the literacy and stigma findings and suggested other factors may influence help-seeking intentions.

    What to keep in mind

    The abstract describes a pilot test with a non-college-educated Latinx adult sample, so the findings may not apply beyond that group. The available summary does not describe additional limitations.

    • A culturally informed psychoeducational video increased mental health literacy in the full sample of Latinx adults.
    • The video unexpectedly increased perceived stigma among Latinx females.
    • Changes in mental health literacy and stigma did not increase help-seeking intentions.
    • The researchers also used two open-ended questions to add context to the quantitative findings.
    • The authors say the results can guide future videos tailored for Latinx audiences.

  • Layered patient involvement broadened inclusion in a dental trial

    What the study found

    The study found that a layered patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) strategy gave the RETURN dental trial a more inclusive and meaningful form of involvement than a single approach would likely have provided. Different layers contributed different kinds of input, and together they broadened participation across the socio-economic spectrum.

    Why the authors say this matters

    The authors conclude that layered approaches can strengthen inclusivity in health inequalities research by combining multiple forms of involvement for different purposes and stages of a study. They also say this can help move beyond tokenism and support meaningful, context-sensitive involvement.

    What the researchers tested

    The paper presents a case study from the RETURN dental study. The researchers embedded a layered PPIE strategy that included a lay researcher, a patient reference group, a community advisory group, and grassroots engagement activities, with both one-off and long-term forms of involvement.

    What worked and what didn't

    More than 300 PPIE collaborators contributed to developing the study, including co-producing the intervention and patient-facing materials, refining patient information sheets and questionnaires, advising on recruitment, and supporting dissemination. The abstract says each layer contributed distinct input, and that differing perspectives across layers provided valuable insights. It also notes that each layer had different contributions, challenges, and lessons learned, but it does not describe specific failures in detail.

    What to keep in mind

    This is a case study from one dental trial, so the abstract does not show how the approach would perform in all research settings. The abstract does not give detailed quantitative comparisons between the layered strategy and a single-layer approach, and it does not list specific limitations beyond noting differing challenges across layers.

    • The RETURN dental study used a layered PPIE strategy rather than a single involvement group.
    • The approach included a lay researcher, a patient reference group, a community advisory group, and grassroots engagement activities.
    • More than 300 PPIE collaborators helped shape the study, including materials, questionnaires, recruitment, and dissemination.
    • The authors say the layered approach was more inclusive and meaningful than a single layer alone.
    • The abstract says different layers brought different perspectives, challenges, and lessons learned.