What the study found
Computer-aided detection (CAD) software used on digital chest X-rays alone found more tuberculosis cases and cost less than CAD followed by C-reactive protein (CRP, a blood test that can indicate inflammation) testing. The combined approach did not meet the study's non-inferiority criterion.
Why the authors say this matters
The authors conclude that, in community active tuberculosis case-finding, CAD followed by CRP offered no advantage over CAD alone because it had lower case yield and higher cost. They also suggest that CAD alone could be an effective and economically viable screening strategy in high-burden areas.
What the researchers tested
This pragmatic community trial with a paired screen-positive design compared two screening approaches within the same participants. Adults in households in Butha-Buthe District, Lesotho, and uMgungundlovu District, South Africa, were screened using CAD4TBv7 alone or CAD4TBv7 followed by CRP testing when the CAD score fell in a specified range, with confirmatory Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra testing when required.
What worked and what didn't
Among 20,023 enrolled participants, the primary outcome set included 73 people with tuberculosis identified by at least one approach and complete data for both. CAD4TBv7 identified 69 of these cases (94.5%), while CAD4TBv7-CRP identified 60 (82.2%); the difference was -12.3%, so the non-inferiority criterion was not met. The cost per detected tuberculosis case was US$5,454 for CAD4TBv7 and US$7,486 for CAD4TBv7-CRP, making the combined approach 37.3% more expensive.
What to keep in mind
The comparison was limited to the study's community setting in two districts and to the participants who met eligibility criteria. The abstract does not describe additional limitations beyond the non-inferiority failure and the cost difference.
- CAD alone detected 69 of 73 tuberculosis cases in the primary outcome set.
- CAD followed by CRP detected 60 of 73 cases and did not meet non-inferiority.
- The combined CAD-CRP approach cost more per detected case than CAD alone.
- The study enrolled 20,023 adults from community settings in Lesotho and South Africa.
- The authors conclude that CAD alone may be a viable screening strategy in high-burden settings.

