What the study found
Ultrasound and radiography were not equally useful across the 119 in-flight medical conditions in the NASA IMPACT Conditions List. The study found that radiography had highly useful diagnostic value in 36 conditions and ultrasound in 38, while neither had diagnostic utility for 63 conditions.
Why the authors say this matters
The authors conclude that imaging is central to modern clinical medicine and that advancing care on exploration-class missions will require imaging capabilities to reduce medical risk. They suggest future missions may consider adding portable radiography if resource constraints allow, and that future work should measure how much risk reduction this would provide.
What the researchers tested
The researchers evaluated the utility of ultrasound and radiography for conditions in the NASA Informing Mission Planning via Analysis of Complex Tradespaces, or IMPACT, Conditions List. Two reviewers used rapid reviews of professional society guidelines and scientific literature, plus subject-matter expertise, to semiquantitatively score each tool for diagnosis and management.
What worked and what didn't
For diagnosis, radiography was highly useful in 36 conditions and ultrasound in 38. For management, radiography was highly useful in 24 conditions and ultrasound in 21. The discussion states that radiography has unique capabilities in more than one-third of conditions and is superior for bony injuries, dental conditions, some pulmonary conditions, orthopedic reductions, and confirming device placement.
What to keep in mind
The abstract describes a rapid-review approach with semiquantitative scoring, so the results reflect that method rather than direct testing in spaceflight settings. The available summary does not describe additional limitations beyond the authors' note that future work should quantify risk reduction from portable radiography.
Key points
- The study assessed ultrasound and radiography across 119 NASA IMPACT in-flight medical conditions.
- Radiography was highly useful for diagnosis in 36 conditions and ultrasound in 38.
- Neither ultrasound nor radiography had diagnostic utility for 63 conditions.
- Radiography was highly useful for management in 24 conditions, while ultrasound was highly useful in 21.
- The authors say radiography is superior for some bone, dental, pulmonary, orthopedic, and device-placement tasks.
Disclosure
- Research title:
- Ultrasound and radiography vary in usefulness for spaceflight conditions
- Authors:
- Michael J Boyle, Michael Pohlen, Kris Lehnhardt, Prashant Parmar, Benjamin Easter
- Publication date:
- 2026-03-01
- OpenAlex record:
- View
Get the weekly research newsletter
Stay current with scholarly research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.